William James , The perception of reality
the many worlds

THE MANY WORLDS.

Habitually and practically we do not *count* these disregarded things as
existents at all. For them *Vœ victis* is the law in the popular philosophy;
they are not even treated as appearances; they are treated as if they were
mere waste, equivalent to nothing at all. To the genuinely philosophic mind,
however, they still have existence, though not the same existence, as the
real things. *As* objects of fancy, as errors, as occupants of dreamland,
etc., they are in their way as indefeasible parts of life, as undeniable
features of the Universe, as the realities are in their way. The total world
of which the philosophers must take account is thus composed of the
realities *plus* the fancies and illusions.

Two sub-universes, at least, connected by relations which philosophy tries
to ascertain! Really there are more than two sub-universes of which we take
account, some of us of this one, and others of that. For there are various
categories both of illusion and of reality, and alongside of the world of
absolute error (i.e., error confined to single individuals) but still within
the world of absolute reality (i.e., reality believed by the complete
philosopher) there is the world of collective error, there are the worlds of
abstract reality, of relative or practical reality, of ideal relations, and
there is the supernatural world. The popular mind conceives of all these
sub-worlds more or less discontentedly; and when dealing with one of them,
forgets for the time being its relations to the rest. The complete
philosopher is he who seeks not only to assign to every given object of his
thought its right place in one or other of these sub-worlds, but he also
seeks to determine the relation of each sub-world to the others in the total
world which *is*.

The most important sub-universes commonly discriminated from each other and
recognized by most of us as existing, each with its own special and separate
style of existence, are the following: [p. 292]

(1) The world of sense, or of physical 'things' as we instinctively
apprehend them, with such qualities as heat, color, and sound, and such
'forces' as life, chemical affinity, gravity, electricity, all existing as
such within or on the surface of the things.

(2) The world of science, or of physical things as the learned conceive
them, with secondary qualities and 'forces' (in the popular sense) excluded,
and nothing real but solids and fluids and their 'laws' (i.e., customs) of
motion. [15<http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/James/Principles/prin21.htm#link15>
]

(3) The world of ideal relations, or abstract truths believed or believable
by all, and expressed in logical, mathematical, metaphysical, ethical, or
aesthetic propositions.

(4) The world of 'idols of the tribe,' illusions or prejudices common to the
race. All educated people recognize these as forming one sub-universe. The
motion of the sky round the earth, for example, belongs to this world. That
motion is not a recognized item of any of the other worlds; but as an 'idol
of the tribe' it really exists. For certain philosophers 'matter' exists
only as an idol of the tribe. For science, the 'secondary qualities' of
matter are but 'idols of the tribe.'

(5) The various supernatural worlds, the Christian heaven and hell, the
world of the Hindoo mythology, the world of Swedenborg's *visa et nudita*,
etc. Each of these is a consistent system, with definite relations among its
own parts. Neptune's trident, e.g., has no status of reality whatever in the
Christian heaven; but within the classic Olympus certain definite things are
true of it, whether one believe in the reality of the classic mythology as a
whole or not. The various worlds of deliberate fable may be ranked with
these worlds of faith -- the world of the *Iliad*, that of *King Lear*, of
the *Pickwick Pacers*, etc.
[16<http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/James/Principles/prin21.htm#link16>]
[p. 293]





-- 
parser
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to