How about: Not this, not that, but Quality/Emptiness/Entanglement.
On Oct 8, 2010, at 4:05 AM, MarshaV wrote: > > On Oct 7, 2010, at 6:46 PM, 118 wrote: > >> Hi Marsha, >> >> Oh, I've taken notice. I love the internet. I still do not know the way >> things really are, however. > > Hi Mark, > > As I see my statement reflected back at me it seems too arrogant, > and I wonder if I can make it seem less so. > > My habit of thought, which unattended seems to happen faster > than the speed of light, is a tendency to reify self and phenomena. > To 'know how things really are' is to know self and phenomena are > not independent self and objects, but a flow of ever-changing, > interdependent, impermanent, static patterns of value. > > Maybe that is a little easier to consider? My short-hand is > 'not this, not that.' > > > Marsha > > > > > > > >> >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:24 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> It was just a suggestion to take notice. One need do the proper >>> investigation and deciding on its importance for oneself. It may >>> become just one more media used for mind control. Something >>> to think about, maybe not. I unplugged from network and cable TV, >>> and my use of the computer is here, and some research when a >>> question or topic calls for it. >>> >>> Freedom is knowing the way things really are and not to get too >>> attached to the way they appear. >>> >>> >>> Marsha >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Oct 7, 2010, at 12:05 PM, 118 wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Marsha, >>>> Net neutrality?, and interesting concept, let's explore. >>>> >>>> Doesn't sound like you are being neutral about it, sounds like you are >>>> taking sides. >>>> >>>> The US postal service is supposed to be neutral, I am having a hard time >>>> with my mail delivery recently. Where does the internet infrastructure >>> come >>>> from? It is a God given right, does it grow on trees? People make >>> things >>>> grow, people are not neutral. >>>> >>>> Is the FCC neutral? Doesn't seem so to me. To extend the analogy, is >>> the >>>> EPA neutral? What about political neutrality, perhaps that is where we >>>> should start. >>>> >>>> One must live in this system with its imperfections. I am your side in >>>> terms of freedom of access, but as Ian said nothing is free. It is the >>>> subversive control in the name of freedom that I find annoying. >>>> >>>> Just my opinion, >>>> Mark >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:18 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Already gone.... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 7, 2010, at 11:00 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Nothing is "free" Marsha. >>>>>> Second link in this post is relevant (article from The Atlantic) >>>>>> http://www.psybertron.org/?p=3478 >>>>>> Ian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:56 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What is this about? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When we log onto the Internet, we take a lot for granted. We assume >>>>> we'll be able to access any Web site we want, whenever we want, at the >>>>> fastest speed, whether it's a corporate or mom-and-pop site. We assume >>> that >>>>> we can use any service we like -- watching online video, listening to >>>>> podcasts, sending instant messages -- anytime we choose. What makes all >>>>> these assumptions possible is Net Neutrality. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What is Net Neutrality? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Net Neutrality is the guiding principle that preserves the free and >>> open >>>>> Internet. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Net Neutrality means that Internet service providers may not >>>>> discriminate between different kinds of content and applications online. >>> It >>>>> guarantees a level playing field for all Web sites and Internet >>>>> technologies. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Net Neutrality is the reason the Internet has driven economic >>>>> innovation, democratic participation and free speech online. It protects >>> the >>>>> consumer's right to use any equipment, content, application or service >>>>> without interference from the network provider. With Net Neutrality, the >>>>> network's only job is to move data -- not to choose which data to >>> privilege >>>>> with higher quality service. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> http://www.savetheinternet.com/frequently-asked-questions?gclid=COeFqfqAwaQCFdJL5Qodtxj-iw >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
