On Oct 12, 2010, at 1:06 PM, Andre Broersen wrote: > Marsha to Andre: > > Your 'judgements' are based on your 'interpretations' of annotations > 129,130,131,132,133 and 135. > It is also your 'opinion' that they are "pretty straightforward > comment/clarifications/observations/judgements." > Your 'opinion' also presumes RMP'S communications skills are absolute and > perfect. I do not believe > he has claimed such an infallible skill. > > Andre: > It has little to do with 'infallible skill'. Let alone such platitudes as > 'absolute' and 'perfect'. These > do not exist in the MOQ. It's about a correct understanding of his own > metaphysics. > As dmb remarked before, I think you are being unreasonable, meaning, you > cannot be reasoned with because > you refuse to be reasonable. Rather I think you are behaving like a > cantankerous adolescent. > > This makes it very difficult to have a REASONABLE discussion with you and > once again I wonder what you > are hoping to achieve on this Discuss which, after all, is about discussing > Mr. Pirsig's MOQ. > > Again, I have not found anything in these annotations that lends itself to > endless discussions about > correct interpretations of them.
And? For me, the MoQ designates Reality = Quality (unpatterned experienced/patterned experience). After that there's plenty of room for discussion. I don't see where either you or Dan(Is there a difference?) looking down a LC-nose should affect my interests. They don't. If you are satisfied with your understanding of annotations 129,130,131, 132,133 and 135, good for you. I have repeatedly stated I am interested in considering the MoQ as a bridge between East and West. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
