Hi Mark,

>> Steve:
>> This is a typical Platteral shift. The question was not about whether
>> religions have any true moral beliefs. Of course they do, and since
>> religions contradict one another's moral teachings they also obviously
>> have a lot of false moral beliefs. If there are any people of faith
>> who are not deceived (if one religion actually is true), then there
>> are certainly millions who are deceived.
>>
>
> Mark:
> Steve, I think you are confusing truth with belief.  I believe I like
> pistachios, that does not make it true.  It is only true that I believe
> that.  All religions are true in that sense.  The deception is realized when
> one changes his/her mind, it does not exist before that.


Steve:
I understand completely that believing something is not the same as it
being true. But in your odd example, I can't see how you could believe
that you like pistachios when you don't really like them.




Steve:
>> The question is what is the basis for moral truth? Is it (1) the
>> authority of prophets and clerics? Or is it (2) the fact that some
>> things are better than others and therefore the distinction between
>> good and bad is open to rational inquiry?



> Mark:
> Yes Steve, that is the question, but you are missing a few choices in the
> multiple choice question.  If I had to choose from the above I would say
> number 1.  The so called authority of prophets and the resulting clerics is
> arrived at through rational inquiry, it is not just made up out of nothing.
>  They are directly addressing the question of moral truth, so the underlying
> premise to their answers provides more basis.


Steve:
Such authorities generally conflate morality with "the will of God"
and claim special divine revellation rather than a reasoned argument
in support of their "moral" pronouncements. They speak on God's behalf
about how to please God rather than speaking on the topic of how to
maximize human well-being.

It is clear that we simply aren't talking about the same thing when we
use the word "morality." I doesn't look to me as though you could
possibly contribute anything to a discussion of morality (any one that
I am interested in) if you don't see morality as being concerned with
conscious experience but rather as whatever a given ecclesiastical
authority decides God wills.

Best,
Steve
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to