----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Glendinning" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] The Moral Landscape
Yes, but we're just back to a debate on the meaning of the word
explain, how, why, etc.
Which is where we started 8 years ago Platt, and I'm more interested
in honesty than word games.
Ian
Platt
8 years ago? Your memory is a lot better than mine. Did you then explain how
emergence explains anything? Please refresh my memory.
Platt.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Platt Holden <[email protected]> wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Glendinning"
<[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 8:56 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] The Moral Landscape
Hi Platt, you said
"[Emergence] only describes what happened".
Which is good surely, ie it's honest and empirical ?
Any explanation that doesn't would therefore be dishonest.
Ian
Hi Ian,
But it doesn't explain anything. Isn't that what science is supposed to
do?
Platt
.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
