Hi Adrie, I guess you don't believe in free speech. Neither did Stalin, Hitler, Mao and all other dictators. On gaining power, that's the first thing dictators insist on -- "Nyet" free speech. Pirsig understood. Free speech is an intellectually-based individual right against the force of social conformity.
Platt On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:50 PM, ADRIE KINTZIGER <[email protected]>wrote: > Wilders is systematically stirring up controverse's between Islamic people > and "White" people. > Only as an example, he wants to legalise a system that denies elementary > rights to native Dutchborn-islamists. > Elementary rights like the right simply to be there, reunification of > broken > marriages for islamic people. > > wilders is deliberatly introducing a Theresienstadt-model based doctrine, > trying to legalise it. > He is one of the biggest criminals around here."legalised criminality", > named common sence by him. > > I do not advokate islamic violence either, i totally dissaprove it. > > The biggest danger however, is people like you , platt, stirring up > controverse's, polarising peoples attention to something that > is deconstructive,...your own defaitisme.its lethal. > > > 2010/10/19 <[email protected]> > > > On 19 Oct 2010 at 17:26, Andre Broersen wrote: > > > > Platt to Steve: > > > > Rather I think anyone who thinks they know better than > > other people about spiritual matters is not only deceiving himself, but > > poses a danger to others. Certainly history shows that to be the case. > > What I know is that I know little. So I don't condemn an entire group > > who, by their acts of charity, may have something of value to teach me. > > > > Andre: > > Yet this is exactly what the Dutch politician Geert Wilders, appealing to > > his right to freedom of speech, has done.(i.e. pretending to know better > > than > > other > > people about spiritual matters (the practice and experience of the Islam > > faith > > is backward > > [as in loony],and in this context, condemning an entire group professing > > that > > faith) > > > > Does that mean that you agree that Wilders, by appealing to his right to > > freedom of speech in > > making these statements, is posing a 'danger to others' and 'deceiving' > > himself? > > > > Just wondering. > > > > Platt > > Rather it's the Muslim ayatollahs who, in the name of Allah, promote > > murder. > > Perhaps you agree they pose a danger to others. As far as I know, Wilders > > has > > never advocated violence against those who disagree with him. Please > > correct me > > if you know otherwise. > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > > Archives: > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > > > > > > -- > parser > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
