Hi Ham, I would like to provide some feedback on the following paragraph of yours:
[Ham] Does Dynamic Quality accurately name the Source whose "dynamics" are unknowable and whose "quality" is realizable only to man? I think not. The term "dynamic" suggests a flow or movement like evolution, which applies to the physical world but not to a transcendent source. I happen to believe this uncreated source does not evolve or change, but is immutable. That's why I have named this metaphysically necessary source Absolute Essence. It's a non-descriptive appellation, yet one that is relevant and logically workable for an ontological scheme [Mark's comment to the above] Formulaically we can term Absolute Essence as zero, both as a constant and as a variable. Everything times zero is zero, for example. This may or may not provide further insight, and I can drop immmediately. Now, while Absolute Essence does not change, its negation (or expression if you will) does follow guidelines. While the possible expression can indeed be postulated to be infinite, such expression is not quite there (although close). Approaching the infinite may mean you are already there... Is it possible to provide attributes to Absolute Essence based on its expression to the subjective sensibility? If so, can it be the mirror image of that which is expressed? This would indeed provide a law of conservation. Perhaps Quality can be seen in the same way. Just a thought (without much basis). Cheers, Mark Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
