Ian said:
...Like I said Adrie, in what way, where do you get that idea from - his 
penultimate paragraph? ... In what way is Ian Angell's home page "religious 
fanaticism" Adrie ?!?!


dmb says:

"This motley crew of smug self-professed humanists was intent on disgracing the 
much-loved Christmas institution, in much the same way a Black Mass profanes 
the Eucharist. How they must have chuckled at their cleverness... Virtuous in 
their indignation against religion, they set about offending every Christian in 
sight. Certain of their own faith in science, these contemptuous and 
contemptible bigots thought nothing of trampling on the beliefs of others. Such 
is the intellectual imperialism of scientism – a prevalent and predominant 
attitude among those who dogmatically project the scientific method as the one 
and only true way of acquiring knowledge about reality and the nature of 
things. ... Indeed, the hubris that comes with an unquestioned belief in 
scientific method, particularly when it is targeted at social, political, 
commercial, and even religious concerns is an accident waiting to happen. 
...It’s time to nail the big lie of the last three centuries, and stop this 
obsession with tidy methodical ‘rational’ solutions. ‘Understanding through 
scientific theory, and applied via its methods’ does not place us in control of 
human destiny. Indeed, there is no such thing as ‘understanding’, only mere 
description through observation … and observation is itself a delusion steeped 
in paradox. Both authors must admit it came as quite a shock to them, both 
agnostics, that the words of a nineteenth century hymn should resonate so well 
with their thinking: Immortal, Invisible, God only wise. In light inaccessible 
hid from our eyes. (Hymns of Christ and the Christian Life, Walter C. Smith.)"


That's where Adrie go the idea, Ian. And if you don't recognize the religious 
motive behind this attack or the childish denigration used to mount that 
attack, then you're not just tone-deaf, you're also blind and numb as well. I 
mean, it's just so obvious. How can you not see it? Just read the quoted except 
out loud and listen to yourself. It should be very clear that the author hates 
science because it threatens his faith. 

Balance, my ass.



                                          
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to