Hi All, For those of you interested in math analogies as applied to Quality, I present the following suggestion.
While Quality has no definition, its expression can be one described though direction. Towards betterness. As such, a vector approach is appropriate. So I provide the following beginning: Dynamic Quality can be seen as a vector of static quality. This is formally written as DQ is equal to SQ with a little arrow over the SQ. Hard to transcribe with the current font system, but some of you may understand this. Further differentiation of the vector is then possible. nope, if you write this in a mathemathikal model, it needs to be projected in all directions, it needs to be a spatial model.You cannot limit the properties of quality down to space dependent vectors. Furthermore, Pirsig rejects the notion of a physikal space within the moq-model (LILA'S CHILD annotations.) 2010/10/31 118 <[email protected]> > Hi All, > > For those of you interested in math analogies as applied to Quality, I > present the following suggestion. > > While Quality has no definition, its expression can be one described though > direction. Towards betterness. > > As such, a vector approach is appropriate. So I provide the following > beginning: Dynamic Quality can be seen as a vector of static quality. > This > is formally written as DQ is equal to SQ with a little arrow over the SQ. > Hard to transcribe with the current font system, but some of you may > understand this. Further differentiation of the vector is then possible. > > Cheers, > Mark > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > -- parser Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
