> > > [Mark] > For those of you interested in math analogies as applied to Quality, I > present the following suggestion. > > While Quality has no definition, its expression can be one described though > direction. Towards betterness. > > As such, a vector approach is appropriate. So I provide the following > beginning: Dynamic Quality can be seen as a vector of static quality. > This > is formally written as DQ is equal to SQ with a little arrow over the SQ. > Hard to transcribe with the current font system, but some of you may > understand this. Further differentiation of the vector is then possible. > > > > [Andrie]
> nope, if you write this in a mathemathikal model, it needs to be projected > in all directions, > it needs to be a spatial model.You cannot limit the properties of quality > down to > space dependent vectors. > Furthermore, Pirsig rejects the notion of a physikal space within the > moq-model > (LILA'S CHILD annotations.) > > [Mark] > Hi Andrie, Yes, I understand your concern. The purpose is not to create an equation that encompasses Quality per se. The purpose is to create an equation with metaphysical implications. I would explain the equation as follows: The appearance of things are as static quality. That is, dynamic quality expresses itself in temporal segments that appear static (for a nanosecond or billions of years). If indeed the levels do imply evolution, then such static domains represent direction. Such direction is a function of dynamic quality. Please note, that I am only including SQ and DQ and not Q in the equation. The vector's direction is one of value or betterness, and indeed, it is not in a three dimensional plane or made up of physical coordinates, but metaphysical ones. Does this make sense? Mark > > > 2010/10/31 118 <[email protected]> > > > Hi All, > > > > For those of you interested in math analogies as applied to Quality, I > > present the following suggestion. > > > > While Quality has no definition, its expression can be one described > though > > direction. Towards betterness. > > > > As such, a vector approach is appropriate. So I provide the following > > beginning: Dynamic Quality can be seen as a vector of static quality. > > This > > is formally written as DQ is equal to SQ with a little arrow over the SQ. > > Hard to transcribe with the current font system, but some of you may > > understand this. Further differentiation of the vector is then possible. > > > > Cheers, > > Mark > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > > Archives: > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > > > > > > -- > parser > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
