Hello everyone On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 7:50 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On 30 Oct 2010 at 20:13, Dan Glover wrote: > >> Ron: >> Hello Dan, >> I mean inorganic, organic, social and intellectual betterness. >> Unless you do not think Quality and betterness have the same meaning. > > Dan: > No, not in this context. You are talking about static patterns of > value. Dynamic Quality is what's better. It is what drives static > quality patterns towards "betterness," an undefined "somethingness" > that isn't a thing at all. Once defined, it is gone... poof. Like a > puffy white cloud in a clear blue summer sky... now it is here, now it > is not. Where does it come from, and where does it go? It is a > meaningless question. It is not a place at all. We are using > intellectual concepts to point to that which is beyond conception. How > can there be four when there isn't even one? > > Platt] > If his past remarks are any indication Dan won't appreciate my agreeing with > him. But, at the risk of implanting the kiss of death I say, "Right on."
Hi Platt I do appreciate it, thank you. I know we differ on our political outlooks as well as other things, but we are the same, deep down. We both appreciate Quality in thought and deed. I value your opinion highly. >Platt: > My answer to what is betterness is whatever improves responsivness to DQ. Dan: Yes I can go along with that. How do you improve your response to Dynamic Quality, if you don't mind my asking? Thanks again, Dan Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
