Hello everyone On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 7:51 AM, X Acto <[email protected]> wrote: > To conclude, > I think Dynamic Quality IS being reduced > to a single, arrested concept with associating > it with meaninglessness. It retards any development > of thoughts, it's an idea once arrived at, hints at resting > on it.
Hi Ron Dynamic Quality is not meaningless... I am not sure where you get that idea. Dynamic Quality is what's better. Ron: > Killing intellectual patterns is useful in times of stuckness > when we are faced with gumption traps. The now of experience > simplifies meaning by returning to the root, through this we > often become unstuck in our thinking. > That is not reducing Dynamic quality to meaninlessnes or > relativism that is recognizing it as the source of meaning > the grounding of our intellectual patterns to the most meaningful. Dan: Dynamic Quality is not to be associated with relativism. You may have gotten that idea on account of our discussion on "betterness" and how that concept is dependent-arising. Please pay attention to the word concept. But remember, Dynamic Quality must be kept concept-free. As far as killing intellectual patterns, I am not sure that that is to be associated with Dynamic Quality either. This now of experience IS Dynamic Quality. The sorting that goes on after is where intelletual concepts arise. Thank you, Dan Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
