Ham, I might jump in real quick, Tim > [Ham] My paradigm here is > that of the individual self looking at its Absolute Source from the > "outside", as it were, and creating an objective reality to represent the > value realized. >
Ham, I know next to nothing about your position, so I don't want to trouble about too much now. I'd also like to say that I have some reservations about Pirsig and the MoQ. While I do suspect that there will never be a way to calculate what the 'right' thing to do is, not at any moment, I think that there is much that could be done to bound that decision / state / process / whatever it is. I have wondered if Pirsig was afraid of his insanity, and if that prevented him from pursuing the highest aspirations that Phaedrus had before ... everything. I have wondered if he settled. I also say something you said yestarday, I think you were talking with Platt, and I don't recall the words (though I could find them if its important - and they were repeated today, as I now recall)... anyway, they suggested to me that you have the desire for more formality. Me too. I have a feeling that something is ripening in this direction. Though I have had similar feeling before, so it could just be a turd. While I was reading ZAMM and Lila, I felt that I was comming at it from across the aisle. Anyway, my paradigm - and I would ask you: what if you look at reality as the "absolute source" trying to know itself? do the constraints of this process produce a physics? Tim -- [email protected] -- http://www.fastmail.fm - A fast, anti-spam email service. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
