The past exists only in our memories, the future only in our plans. The present is our only reality. The tree that you are aware of intellectually, because of that small time lag, is always in the past and therefore is always unreal. Any intellectually conceived object is always in the past and therefore unreal. Reality is always the moment of vision before the intellectualization takes place. There is no other reality. This preintellectual reality is what Phædrus felt he had properly identified as Quality. Since all intellectually identifiable things must emerge from this preintellectual reality, Quality is the parent, the source of all subjects and objects.
Zam, about around 1974 MarshaV aan MoQ details weergeven 16:13 (1 uur geleden) "Theoretical physicists Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow recently stated: "There is no way to remove the observer -- us -- from our perceptions of the world ... In classical physics, the past is assumed to exist as a definite series of events, but according to quantum physics, the past, like the future, is indefinite and exists only as a spectrum of possibilities." "If we, the observer, collapse these possibilities (that is, the past and future) then where does that leave evolutionary theory, as described in our schoolbooks? Until the present is determined, how can there be a past? The past begins with the observer, us, not the other way around as we've been taught." 2010, grand design. (Adrie) The biggest promotor of this was John Archibald Wheeler once it was recognised, it became impossible to get around it. It exists in many forms now,...a variant is embedded in the many-worlds interpretation(Hawking) originating; ,"William James." 2010/11/12 MarshaV <[email protected]> > > "Theoretical physicists Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow recently > stated: > > "There is no way to remove the observer -- us -- from our perceptions of > the world ... In classical physics, the past is assumed to exist as a > definite series of events, but according to quantum physics, the past, like > the future, is indefinite and exists only as a spectrum of possibilities." > > "If we, the observer, collapse these possibilities (that is, the past and > future) then where does that leave evolutionary theory, as described in our > schoolbooks? Until the present is determined, how can there be a past? The > past begins with the observer, us, not the other way around as we've been > taught." > > > > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-lanza/why-are-you-here-new-theo_b_781055.html?view=print > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > -- parser Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
