And?
On Nov 12, 2010, at 12:00 PM, ADRIE KINTZIGER wrote: > The past exists only in our memories, the future only in our plans. The > present is our only reality. The tree that you are aware of intellectually, > because of that small time lag, is always in the past and therefore is > always unreal. Any intellectually conceived object is always in the past and > therefore unreal. Reality is always the moment of vision before the > intellectualization takes place. There is no other reality. This > preintellectual reality is what Phædrus felt he had properly identified as > Quality. Since all intellectually identifiable > things must emerge from this preintellectual reality, Quality is the parent, > the source of all subjects and objects. > > > Zam, about around 1974 > > > > > MarshaV aan MoQ > details weergeven 16:13 (1 uur geleden) > > > "Theoretical physicists Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow recently > stated: > > "There is no way to remove the observer -- us -- from our perceptions of the > world ... In classical physics, the past is assumed to exist as a definite > series of events, but according to quantum physics, the past, like the > future, is indefinite and exists only as a spectrum of possibilities." > > "If we, the observer, collapse these possibilities (that is, the past and > future) then where does that leave evolutionary theory, as described in our > schoolbooks? Until the present is determined, how can there be a past? The > past begins with the observer, us, not the other way around as we've been > taught." > > > 2010, grand design. > > > (Adrie) > The biggest promotor of this was John Archibald Wheeler > once it was recognised, it became impossible to get around it. > It exists in many forms now,...a variant is embedded in the many-worlds > interpretation(Hawking) originating; ,"William James." > > > > 2010/11/12 MarshaV <[email protected]> > >> >> "Theoretical physicists Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow recently >> stated: >> >> "There is no way to remove the observer -- us -- from our perceptions of >> the world ... In classical physics, the past is assumed to exist as a >> definite series of events, but according to quantum physics, the past, like >> the future, is indefinite and exists only as a spectrum of possibilities." >> >> "If we, the observer, collapse these possibilities (that is, the past and >> future) then where does that leave evolutionary theory, as described in our >> schoolbooks? Until the present is determined, how can there be a past? The >> past begins with the observer, us, not the other way around as we've been >> taught." >> >> >> >> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-lanza/why-are-you-here-new-theo_b_781055.html?view=print >> >> >> ___ >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> > > > > -- > parser > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
