Hi Arlo, > I understand the concern. Throwing out a question as a trap is not appropriate. What I am trying to do is get an understanding of MOQ by bridging it to other philosophies and movements. I would be the first to say that I do not know what Humanism is as understood in the modern American. I suppose that there is an emphasis on rationality in the sense of what we know through science. Perhaps this seems a bit limited to me.
As a pre-conceptual awareness, there are many possible ways to interpret Quality. Such interpretation must be mainstreamed in some way. So, I would perhaps prefer to delve into how to describe MOQ. I certainly understand the radical empiricist view in a superficial way. The concept of man is the measure of all things is not complete, in my opinion. I will certainly read more about the Humanist movement, and provide an interpretation as it applies to MOQ imo. Thanks for the productive response Mark > > [Arlo] > There is no hope for that dialogue to be anything but dysfunctional, since > its > evident that there will not even be consensus as to what "Humanism" is, > that > its being set up as just another bugbear in the boogeyman soup. > > But if you want to discuss this, let's see if we can at least begin with an > understanding of what is meant by "Humanism". I've just read over the > Wikipedia > entry, please do the same and let me know if you think this is an > acceptable > "definition" of the term. > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
