Mark, relationalism could be a real gem, thanks, Tim
> I prefer the concept of relationalism. I do not like what Wiki has to > say > about this, and I would direct anybody interested to: Relationalism.org. > to > start. I do not draw completely from this idea, but it provides some > kind > of foundation for discussion. In particular, the extract of a paper from > J. > Kaipayil, > > http://relationalism.org/Documents/Excerpt%20from%20Relationalism.pdf. > > This extract also provides some of the notions that I have been > presenting > in terms of the basic similarity between science and metaphysics. > > Perhaps this should be a new subject, and I have tried to introduce my > concept of relationalism into the group by incorporating Quality. In > this > sense I do not necessarily agree completely with the site I just > presented. > It is my feeling that the existence of objects can be presented more > fundamentally through metaphysics. > > Mark > > > [Tim] Thanks for this ref; I don't know HOW you found him! Just so everyone knows, it looks like you can read all his works, in full, on google; he provides a link. also, I haven't read any further than this, but in one of his works he formulates his concepts of "I-exist, I-know and I-act" - tying into discussions I have been having, mainly with alexander, where perhaps his I-exist is in line with the I who is in the utter present of DQ (my faithful-I). Tim -- [email protected] -- http://www.fastmail.fm - One of many happy users: http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/quotes.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
