Hi John and Ham, >
> John: > As dmb pointed out, the literal meaning of a-theist, is non-theist. So > while being a literally correct term, it's fraught with anti-theistic > connotation in my view, that are inappropriate for a truly profound > metaphysical stance. > > [Mark] > In order to be anti or a- anything one has to experience it first (I read realization in this post, but deleted it for nefarious purposes). I am anti-Snoop Dog, for example. If one has experienced Theism or God, for example, then he/she can be anti-theist. Otherwise one is just against the symbology, which has no substance. Atheists are against people and what they believe, not the concept, unless it is against their own concept. If that is true, then it is a case of phantasmagoria as Ham would say. Some in the MOQ can think that Christians are just plain stupid but that would not be my stand in the MOQ. I don't have time for other peoples ghosts, they can be anti-dragons for all I care. But, I could be wrong, Mark Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
