Correction: I meant Phantasmaphobia in describing some atheists. Mark
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:33 PM, 118 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi John and Ham, >> > > >> John: >> As dmb pointed out, the literal meaning of a-theist, is non-theist. So >> while being a literally correct term, it's fraught with anti-theistic >> connotation in my view, that are inappropriate for a truly profound >> metaphysical stance. >> >> [Mark] >> > In order to be anti or a- anything one has to experience it first (I read > realization in this post, but deleted it for nefarious purposes). I am > anti-Snoop Dog, for example. If one has experienced Theism or God, for > example, then he/she can be anti-theist. Otherwise one is just against the > symbology, which has no substance. Atheists are against people and what > they believe, not the concept, unless it is against their own concept. If > that is true, then it is a case of phantasmagoria as Ham would say. Some in > the MOQ can think that Christians are just plain stupid but that would not > be my stand in the MOQ. I don't have time for other peoples ghosts, they > can be anti-dragons for all I care. > > But, I could be wrong, > Mark > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> > > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
