Ham, I was just reading over my just posted long post... At the end I read this, of yours:
"Nothingness is the negation of Essence..." and it jumped out to me that this is what I should have seen; this is backwards. I believe the opposite: Essence is the negation of nothingness --- except I call that eternal, absolute, (and I call it something-is) because nothingness could not have come before it. And I also recognize that 'the negation' is a processing step which cannot leave everything the same as it was: something must change or the process did not occur. And so nothingness cannot be produced by essence. And ... perhaps this makes the issue easy to debate, or did I misconstrue this, or excerpt it improperly... what does the inverse of your 'essence' look like to you? Tim -- [email protected] -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
