Hi Tim, Wow, now we are talking in poetry, which is appropriate since MOQ is closer to that than rational thought. One cannot get there just rationally, one can only paint a picture, but not experience MOQ. That is, one can only meander around the edges and look in with rational thought. There are some who are still there, needing connections with something historical that can be defined, to bring some understanding within.
Technically whether something is constant or not requires some reference point. I do not think the absolute has such a reference. But I do like what you are suggesting in terms of dynamic quality, absolute yet moving. Cool. In my interpretation anyway. Mark On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:49 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Ham > I know I said I wouldn't press, but I can't help this one! I am doing > my homework - which might prove useful to you and others, but it is a > lot (and it is probably embarrassing to me too), so we will have to see. > Anyway, I think your terminology and perspective is starting to > penetrate my numb-skull, though I have a lot left to do. Anyway, you > said (in one of these past emails): "What is already absolute cannot be > extended." But I say: what is already absolute cannot remain constant. > > what do you say? > > enjoy, > Tim > -- > > [email protected] > > -- > http://www.fastmail.fm - Choose from over 50 domains or use your own > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
