Dan said to Mark:
Anti-theism requires more than a disbelief in God or gods (atheism). It
requires first, a belief that theism is harmful to society and culture and
second, that theism should be controverted in order to eliminate the harm it
does. It seems clear (to me) that that is what Robert Pirsig is on about in the
Copleston annotations, as well as Verne Dusenberry in his doctoral thesis The
Montana Cree: A Study in Religious Persistence. So, it is possible for a
religious person to be anti-theistic in the sense that they realize the harm
done by the superimposition of one religion over another.
dmb says:
I agree with Dan.
There are several legitimate reasons to be concerned about the particular forms
of theism in our present culture, especially the political culture. The Pope's
recent "softening" of the Church's position on the use of condoms, for example.
In the age of HIV, this translates into many deaths. There were several U.S.
Senate candidates who held very extreme positions on abortions - based on their
religious convictions. The efforts to teach creationism is a bit disturbing
too.
There is also the problem that Campbell put so neatly: "Religion is a
misinterpretation of myth." Theism is a result of misreading the symbolic
language of myth as concrete historical facts. It's a result of looking AT the
window instead of looking THRU the window. There are some passages in Lila that
say just that. Static patterns form and eventually block the light. That's
theism.
But Pirsig's comment in the annotations is about the MOQ being "anti-theistic"
in much more specific way. In that case, his complaint is about the way
philosophy is being used to prop up theism. It's wrong to make philosophy into
the servant of religion. Because religion is social quality and philosophy is
intellectual quality, he sees such service as an evil act. This same basic
moral relationship holds in general. According the MOQ, a society guided by
intellectual quality is absolutely superior to one that is not so guided.
This particular comment is relevant to our own conduct here, no? Wouldn't it be
equally evil to make the MOQ the servant of theism? I think so.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
