On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, david buchanan <[email protected]>wrote:
> > Marsha said: > The English language evolved in relationship with a understanding that > reality was comprised of self and external objects, so the moment I use this > language, it places any explanation of a experience-based reality into some > degree of contradiction. If you know a method to bypass this problem, > please present it. > > dmb said: > I know a way to get around it. It's called the MOQ. Ever heard about Robert > Pirsig's work? It's just what you're looking for. > > [Mark says] Or, you could try a Zen koan instead of a long drawn out explanation: -------Shuzan held out his short staff and said, "If you call this a short staff, you oppose its reality. If you do not call it a short staff, you ignore the fact. Now what do you wish to call this?" ------ Making it complicated with all sorts of philosophical connections does not make it more real. > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
