On Nov 27, 2010, at 1:25 PM, 118 wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, david buchanan <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>> Marsha said:
>> The English language evolved in relationship with a understanding that
>> reality was comprised of self and external objects, so the moment I use this
>> language, it places any explanation of a experience-based reality into some
>> degree of contradiction. If you know a method to bypass this problem,
>> please present it.
>>
>> dmb said:
>> I know a way to get around it. It's called the MOQ. Ever heard about Robert
>> Pirsig's work? It's just what you're looking for.
>>
>> [Mark says]
> Or, you could try a Zen koan instead of a long drawn out explanation:
>
> -------Shuzan held out his short staff and said, "If you call this a short
> staff, you oppose its reality. If you do not call it a short staff, you
> ignore the fact. Now what do you wish to call this?" ------
>
> Making it complicated with all sorts of philosophical connections does not
> make it more real.
How about this:
While sustaining biological and social patterns
Kill all intellectual patterns.
Kill them completely
And then follow Dynamic Quality
And morality will be served.
(LILA,Chapter 32)
___
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
