[Pirsig]
The defect is that subject-object science has no provision for morals.  ...Now
that intellect was in command of society for the first time in history, was
THIS the intellectual pattern it was going to run society with?"

[Marsha]
Yes, science has the subject-object defect, as do all Intellectual static
patterns of value...

[Arlo]
Can you explain why your ideas about Intellect=SOM are better than Pirsig's
ideas that Intellect!=SOM? Do you think your ideas have better explanatory
power? Offer the possibility for better solutions? What does your MOQ offer
that Pirsig's does not?


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to