Marsha said (many times):
Reification decontextualizes. Intellectual patterns process from a
subject/object conceptual framework creating false boundaries that give the
illusion of independence as a “thing” or an “object of analysis.”
dmb said:
Marsha thinks reification is just any kind of conceptualization. .. she
conflates a conceptual error with conceptualization itself. And when you do
that, all conceptualizations are erroneous whether they have been confused with
objective entities or not. When you do that, mistaking thoughts for things has
to be given another name because reification no longer refers to that
conceptual error because anybody who thinks about anything in any way is
reifying.
dmb now asks Marsha:
Presuming that you write what you think, how does my description fail to
describe what you think? You should be able to see that I not only understand
what you think, I can also see what's wrong with that thought. If you'd stop
and think about it, you'll see that I'm trying to rid you of a misconception.
You're welcome.
And thanks for going out of your way to tell me that you don't give a shit.
That's real sweet. You charmer, you.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
