[DMB]
In the same way that she conflates the intellectual level with the
flaw in dualistic science, she conflates a conceptual error with
conceptualization itself.... The problem is assuming that subjects
and objects are the metaphysical starting points of reality. That's
reification. That's a conceptual error.
[Arlo]
Exactly right. While its obvious why Marsha can't do more than repeat
her "interpretation", this is the sort of confusion that leaves me
wondering what's the point? I mean, "reification" is the conceptual
error Pirsig's ideas were offered to correct!
And I'd ask again, why is Marsha's idea that the intellectual level
is reification BETTER than Pirsig's ideas where reification is an
error within the intellectual level to be fixed? (I understand this
question will never be answered, it will be met with three attacks,
two evasions and then a repeat of "my interpretation is...")
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
