Hi Mark and Marsha
It was very long since I studied Einstein and Planck but I've always had
the feeling that they were talking across each other.
E about the room, massa and energy "in rest" and P about the same in
movement.
Michael Porter teached me how to make money of it.
Frank Zappa showed me how to laugh at it.
JA
[email protected] skrev 2010-12-03 11.37:
Hi Marsha,
Physics is interesting isn't it? I love the metaphysical aspects. I
think (in my naivete) that constants such a Plank's are more a result
of the math, than the reality (whatever that is). These constants
seem to fall out when we are equating things that are of different
dimensional qualities. But is interesting to know, that with the math
of quantum theory we are only able to measure little itsy bitsy
Planks. There is also something about Cubits that is interesting, but
I forget what now. Anyway, Planks and Cubits. One makes up the world
and one saved humanity from the Great Flood. Cool stuff.
The rationality of these theories is still based on assumptions, which
we make up.
Mark
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:53 PM, MarshaV<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Btw, this book contains excellent footnotes and glossary. ?From the glossary:
>
> Planck's length: ..., it is the dimension at which space becomes a quantum
foam and know physics break down. ?It is also the length of superstrings.
>
> Planck's time: ..., it is the shortest time interval that can exist. ?Know
physics break down for time intervals smaller than Planck's time.
>
> ?(Mathieu Ricard& Trinh Xuan Thuan, 'The Quantum and the Lotus: A Journey
to the Frontiers Where Science and Buddhism Meet',p.300)
>
> ---
>
> Must get rid of those irrational and paradoxical answers...
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
