Hi John, On Dec 7, 2010, at 1:17 PM, John Carl wrote:
> Marsha, I'm in an agreeable mood so here's hoping: I'm in a cheerful mood. > > John: >> However, an important point is that our understanding >>> of reality is a negotiation. It's not contained in me, it's not defined >>> by you. It's what we agree upon - the entanglement between. >> Marsha: >> And if we don't agree? >> >> > John: > Then our "entanglement" gets more tangled. Here is where a faithful-I is > necessary. It is our wish to have agreement which keeps us entangled. > > Do you think Lila wished to become more entangled? Or did she wish to > become less? No, unless that it to agree that you are very creative fellow. On the nature of reality, I'm not looking for a consensus. And I have not the slightest idea what Lila wished for. I don't even know how to answer such a question. And I'm not sure I agree with your faithful-I. Agreeably yours though, Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
