On Dec 8, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Steven Peterson wrote: > Hi Marsha, > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:30 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Dec 7, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Steven Peterson wrote: >> >>> Does Quality = Reality or does the MOQ = Reality? >> >> >> Hi Steve, >> >> For me it is both. The MoQ as explained in LILA is >> an intellectual pattern, and the MoQ designates >> Reality = Quality. >> >> Marsha > > Steve: > > You say it is both, but your explanation is a denial that it is both. > You say that the MOQ is not reality, instead the MOQ designates that > Quality = Reality. That is the difference that I was trying to get > across. It is why there is no container logic problem. Reality > contains the MOQ. The MOQ describes reality. It describes itself as > part of reality and in particular part of the intellectual level.
Hi Steve, 1.) The MoQ as explained in Lila is a set of intellectual patterns that present and explain the theory that Reality = Quality(DQ/sq). 2.) MoQ denotes Reality = Quality. Quality as experienced. I don’t expect you to understand! Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
