I'd say they'd also articulated a certain stubbornly obtuse evasion of sincere philosophical discussion, Matt. Their "I" wasn't being too faithful and their non-language an expression of "not I" - as in, who wants to philosophize?
"Not I" being their answer. John On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Matt Kundert <[email protected]>wrote: > > Think about this way John: if you told someone that it was language > all the way down, and they looked down at their feet and said they > didn't see any language anywhere, they'd just articulated to you the > sensitivity to context Steve and Rorty desire, and how the notion of > "not language" still plays a role. > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
