On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 2:13 AM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR <[email protected]> wrote:
> [Platt] > No matter how you slice it, the intellectual level (described by Pirsig as > manipulation of abstract symbols) presumes the subject/object division and > is > thus the SOL. > > [Arlo] > SOM is a metaphysical position that posits that the PRIMARY division of > reality > is S/O. You continue to confuse the "subjects" and "objects" of grammar > with a > metaphysical stance. > [Platt] On the contrary. You confuse a metaphysical stance with its symbols. > > But, here's another chance going into the new year. If Bo's MOQ is better > than > Pirsig's MOQ, please explain to me how? Do you think it has more > explanatory > power? Solves problems better? Explain to me why I should find Bo's ideas > to be > of a higher Quality than Pirsig's? What do they offer that Pirsig's does > not? > [Platt] It places the conceptually unknown within the moral hierarchy. Otherwise DQ has no home. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
