Just a couple of brief comments Tim, (Horse has asked for breathing space before any particular suggestions / actions .... don't jump to conclusions.)
You said "You had a bunch of posts after this one I replied to earlier. I read some of them. I saw then that you too might be a misfit!" [IG] Then you must agree your reading of the situation is based on very limited short term experience. You said " .. so 'progress' is "whatever happens"?!" [IG] No, the process matters. (There were 8 or 10 other words in the sentence you snipped those two from). You said " .. first, the pattern that was chosen seems to be 'not-xxxx'; and I don't see how that is higher quality than 'xxxx'. I am baffled." [IG] You're baffled because you are objectifying (dare I say reifying) 'xxxx' as a particular pattern and creating a false dichotomy. I'm talking about a balance of sq and DQ interactions - a process involving many overlapping patterns, not an object subject to simple "accounting" of value. Regards Ian Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
