On Jan 4, 2011, at 9:35 AM, Arlo Bensinger wrote: > You labeled your post "X = no-self", and then signed it "Marsha"...
Used conventionally. > You then said, "Xxxx s a collection of ever-changing...", and yet as far back > as I can see you signed your posts with "Marsha"... Continuity? Marsha is a conventional label. > You then say "If you haven't figured that out yet, you do not have an iota of > MoQ understanding"... I'd say there are many ways people demonstrate a lack > of "MOQ understanding"... You are correct. > You conclude, "To those who would call me angel or asshole, know that that > name-calling is a reflection of your own patterns"... I thought everything > was interdependent? Seems it would be a reflection of both the caller and the > callee... No Arlo, not if the callee is a collection of ever-changing, interdependent, inorganic, biological, social and intellectual static patterns of value entangled within a field of DQ. To what would such a label attach? What do you think the 'self' is within the MoQ? You might check your copy of the MoQ Textbook. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
