[Marsha]
I do not insist.
[Arlo]
No? Because as far back as I can see in the archives there are posts
by "Marsha". Tell me, do you have a driver's license? Does it say
"Marsha" on it? What about your paycheck? I am certainly not talking
about "nicknames", of course we are known by variations, but there is
a striving towards continuity or perseverance, and my question to you
is why? If "no self" is all there is, what is the value that drives this?
[Marsha]
I would prefer not to confuse you.
[Arlo]
I would think you'd find it a greater confusion to make people think
there is a "Marsha", or any continuity there at all. Why do you think
it would "confuse" me if you didn't insist on this continuity? Would
it confuse you?
[Marsha]
Doesn't mean they are equally interconnected. - I never stated
"mutually dependent." Are you going to start playing sophistry?
[Arlo]
No, I am going to insist that if you say things you are able to
handle the ramifications. So now we have patterns that are
"disequally interconnected"?
If all patterns are interconnected (and I agree they are), then
reflections brought by interaction are reflections on all involved. A
dialogue is like a tapestry, any imperfections are constructed mutually.
You seem to be saying you can murder someone, but if I call you a
"murderer" then that is a reflection just on me. (Or, conversely,
that you can rescue a child from a burning car, but if I call you a
"hero" that is just a reflection of me.) The negotiative aspect of
discourse is aligning the two.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
