To Marsha, spot on I'd say. To Arlo, Do you not see "self" as an issue "behind things" here ? I ask because your points .... clearly Marsha finds a handle pragmatically useful like the rest of us, clearly objectifying the (named) individual is a pitfall the MoQ intends us to avoid, and clearly it takes two to "reflect" .... don't address that particular point.
Ian. On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:13 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Greetings, > > Xxxx s a collection of ever-changing, interdependent, inorganic, biological, > social and intellectual static patterns of value entangled within a field of > DQ. If you haven't figured that out yet, you do not have an iota of MoQ > understanding. - So before moving on to a subject as emotionally charged as > politics, maybe there should be a review of what the 'self' is within the > MoQ. - To those who would call me angel or asshole, know that that > name-calling is a reflection of your own patterns. > > > Marsha > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
