dmb, I considered my response to this and thought I'd take dan's advice and really think for a while rather than dive in and go with my usual off-the-cuff, slap-dash manner. But upon further reflection, there really is no point is there? There is no possible way I could conceivably convince you against your will and we've been round and round enough now that I already know how it's going to end up.
> I mean, don't you see that Pirsig not only disagrees philosophically, he is > horrified and disgusted by absolute idealism all along the way. And yes, > James was friends with Royce but James was nauseated by absolute idealism. > And that's pretty much how I feel about it too. Why can't you just accept > the fact that they don't like it? It rubs them in all the wrong ways. Deal > with it. > > I think you're right dave. I don't agree with your closed-mindedness, but I understand clearly that I'm not going to change it, so why bother? Arguing with an Intellectual academic can go one of two ways, either my opinion coincides with yours, in which case I'm dismissed because I'm boring, or my opinion diverges from yours and I'm dismissed because I'm wrong. The classic lose/lose scenario. Congrats. You win. These are the last words of mine you will ever be unwillingly subjected to. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
