I'm very sure of it that i presented the link to the erowid vault about 9 months ago, probably in a conversation with Ian And Horse. I wrote some shit in the erowid-user expierience corner under a pen name. Recognising Tuukka's name made me curious,and a sthe internet is a public domain,i wrote a little string in the prompt,...good shit,Tuukka's observations on his blog's, abstractions on philosophy, good one's..Bertrand Russel!
Some links however , very badly infected with malicious scripting bots, phising tools, e-mail grabbers, sad really sad, actually some of them are reported as spamprobe's.....His own mailhandler took some offline. Honestly, he's a good guy, Tuukka,very intelligent, wide -spektrum thinker strong in his own language.very nice blogs, good user's interface In short , if he cleans up his machine for infections, i will concider him as a friend. Adrie Have you made it your business to search out information about everyone on this list? What have you discovered from my email address? Marsha. Never checked you out , Marsh, i think it would be an immoral act to open Pandora's box,..and besides, you'r a quality-fairy. 2011/3/10 MarshaV <[email protected]> > > Adire, > > Have you made it your business to search out information about everyone > on this list? What have you discovered from my email address? > > Marsha > > > > > On Mar 10, 2011, at 4:37 AM, ADRIE KINTZIGER wrote: > > > Hate to inform you , Tuukka,and the other listers, that your machinery > and > > the > > server your working on is heavely infected with virusses, bots,phising > > tools, > > social engineering tools,...etc, if i check your postings on the web > under > > > > fi.virtap....etc, my antivirusshield pops up several times. > > > > The stanford link is solid to present,but if you present other links in > the > > future,.. > > Other listers are warned not to open them, without scanning for safety > > first. > > > > Yeah, the zolpidem photo, yes correct. > > Hm , i'm not going to post further on this item.I'm not heading for a > > defacement or something. > > > > ps, a line in one of your postings took my "attention",...this one > > > > 'It begs the question' > > > > quote from here. > > You seem to be claiming that pragmatists require a meta-system, which > would > > dictate, which systems have a "true" notion of truth, and which systems > have > > a "false" notion of truth. But if pragmatists did this, they would only > be > > begging the question - for what is the notion of truth, that the > meta-system > > uses, based on? On "working well"? What does that mean? That "true" > notions > > of truth have Quality? > > --------------------------------------- > > what i mean to say by it,--it begs the question,this phrase is very well > > known here on the list,...its not the first time it is used > > > > greetzz, Adrie > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > -- parser Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
