No. That was MY acquiescing to your more important topic, but still suggesting the interviews were good.
On Mar 16, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: > Did I ever suggest they weren't ? > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 2:21 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Ian, >> >> Communicating and understanding Quantum concepts is very important, >> so I will definitely read the paper. Thanks. But the screenwriters are very >> interesting too with much to say about creativity. >> >> >> Marsha >> >> >> On Mar 16, 2011, at 9:53 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: >> >>> BTW Marsha, >>> >>> I meant to draw this post to your attention, it's a subject that interests >>> you. >>> The underlying paper is diabolically mathematical theoretical physics, >>> but the words are worth reading IMHO. >>> >>> http://www.psybertron.org/?p=3758 >>> >>> Ian ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
