Marsha to Andre: I assume you understand the point you are trying to make, but I do not get it.
Andre: Hello MOQ'ers! Those who are left on this discuss to talk about Pirsig's MOQ are now called dogmatists! Any attempt and/or counter argument citing Pirsig and other supporting evidence (e.g. James) used by these dogmatic MOQ contributors to point to the misconceptions/misunderstandings/dead ends/irrelevancies to Pirsig's MOQ by other posters are in their turn asked to justify their premise through misunderstanding or simple ignorance or bloody minded stubbornness ( Mark suggesting to dmb that he (Mark) has 'yet to see some fundamental premises of MoQ coming through your posts'... obviously never even read the archives and dmb's impressive energy put in every post he has posted!!). This is really frustrating and insulting! So when Marsha asks me to clarify my point ( Marsha confuses DQ with sq) she claims "I do not get it'. And John is still after confirmation of his 'Absolute' Roycean flavour. I am sorry but to have the tables turned on 'dogmatists' for proof and supportive evidence whilst quoting this evidence from its original source and supporting ideas mentioned in that original source and then ( by the so called non-dogmatists) to still claim ignorance is intellectual dishonesty at its worst. My only recourse left is to urge Mark, Marsha, John etc to read ZMM and LILA. It is that simple. Then we can have a conversation. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
