[Dan]
I would issue a caution that Dynamic Quality cannot be understood in
an intellectual sense. "It" comes before intellectualization. I
understand you to say by "ever-changing" that Dynamic Quality is "not
this, not that." And that's okay. But it should be stressed that
change as we understand it is a static quality pattern, as is "not
this, not that," and every "thing" we discuss. Otherwise, I fully agree.
[Arlo]
An excellent point, thank you. I typically use scare quotes when I
mean to convey this, and I apologize at not making this idea
stronger. So the difference between saying, DQ is ever-changing, and,
DQ is "ever changing", is one that I see and mean, but should
probably be more clear about. And that is precisely the point you make.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
