Hi Marsha, On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:39 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > Greetings Mark, > > I agree mathematics and black holes are a curious and interesting > expressions of Quality. Will this information elevate man's psyche and > expand his heart? Those would be conventional expressions of > Quality I would prefer. That is if there was an I, and if under the static > noise the Universe wasn't already Goodness. > > If there were a mathematical equation for the heart, then it may be meaningful. I suppose it will elevate it as much as any meaningful information. When you speak of elevation, I assume you are speaking of betterness. This is a personal thing, and I kind of like equations.
Cheers, Mark > > > > On Mar 24, 2011, at 2:35 AM, 118 wrote: > >> Hi Marsha, >> >> I agree, it is a special language. It is not over your head, just >> like Arabic is not over your head (you don't speak Arabic do you?). >> The language of math insulates until those involved in it think that >> it is all there is. I love theoretical science, it is a mixture >> between metaphysics and science fiction. Anything is possible in that >> realm. Don't be fooled to thinking that math proves anything. It is >> yet another creation. >> >> Cheers, >> Mark >> >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:19 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Mark, >>> >>> It doesn't prove much primarily because I didn't hear enough of the >>> interview and because my knowledge of mathematics is too limited >>> to build an informed opinion. But basically I think the conclusion one >>> draws is dependent on the questions asked, and the testing methods >>> and instruments used to verify the hypothesis. - The fact that the >>> mathematical information describing the inside of a black hole can >>> never be tested except through additional mathematical methods, >>> leaves me to wonder what is the definition of science these days? >>> In what sense it it empirical? >>> >>> Anyway, it's more than a bit over my head. >>> >>> >>> Marsha >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mar 23, 2011, at 3:36 PM, 118 wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Marsha, >>>> I read the Fabric of the Cosmos by Greene, it was pretty clear. >>>> Mathematical reality is pretty powerful, but not the only one imho. >>>> It may be easier to defend such a reality than other forms, but does >>>> this prove anything to you? >>>> >>>> Mark > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
