Hi Dan, I don't know who you are. I used to think I did. What are you objecting to? Are you always this rude to people? I find your comments unhelpful and nasty without reason. Why don't you go Fxxx yourself?
Thanks, Mary -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dan Glover Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 12:06 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [MD] [Bulk] Re: MOQ and Completeness Theories (Sorry, Godel.) Hello everyone On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Mary <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Arlo, > > Pretty late for me on a 'school' night, but your excellent post > deserves a response - quickly. > > [Mary now] > Of course it is stuck in subjectivism. Absolutely! Remember, I am > one who thinks the Intellectual Level is SOM all the way, for all of > us, all the time. I happen to think that anyone unwilling to admit > that is kidding themselves - and I see you, DMB, Andre, and Dan kidding yourselves daily. Hi Mary You'll have to add Robert Pirsig's name to that list. BTW, I thought we were done with this SOM as intellect bullshit. Did you not get Horse's memo? Dan Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
