Hi Joe, OK, fine by me.
Mark On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mark nd all, > > I prefer to see emotions as a level in evolution. Since they are > indefinable, in a DQ/SQ metaphysical division they can only be DQ. > > Joe > > > On 4/13/11 8:49 PM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Joe, >> >> Ideas are emotions put to language. This is the impact of the >> societal level on our individual level. We do not put ideas to words >> unless we want to communicate them. This is one of the errors that >> are made in equating so much with static quality. It only becomes >> static when one puts it to words and enters into the social level. >> Otherwise words are not necessary. Most of our thoughts are wordless, >> and as such it is hard to differentiate them from what you call >> emotions. >> >> Only a small fraction of our thoughts are brought to the attention >> level, and this is for societal or communication purposes. Most >> thoughts reside in what you may call emotions. What would you call an >> idea that has no words? Perhaps such a thing does not make sense to >> you, but at least think about it. >> >> I have no problem with your abstraction of the emotional level, but >> perhaps I don't see it the same way that you do. Most ideas are >> emotions. They happen before you place attention on them. >> >> Cheers, >> Mark >> >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Mark, >>> >>> Ideas are not emotions. To deny the emotional level in evolution DQ/SQ >>> makes definition a metaphysical principle rather than the more comprehensive >>> evolution in existence. >>> >>> >>> On 4/12/11 4:13 PM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Joe, >>>> While you are longing DQ, I am living it. Your clown tears streak your >>>> face. >>>> Mark >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, April 12, 2011, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi Dan and All >>>>> >>>>> As I read your response to Arlo, I am in tears. The longing for the MOQ >>>>> that is contained within your words is breathtaking. DQ/SQ, the longing >>>>> is >>>>> DQ, no way to define it. I wish, in some way, that evolution could be >>>>> explored with the same reverence for Pirsig's endeavors. >>>>> >>>>> Joe >>> >>> >>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>> Archives: >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >>> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
