> > Dan: > So you believe there are many MOQs? > > Ron: > SOM is a MOQ , because it's value all the way down, and experience is reality > then it stands to reason that there are indeed many,the gallery of paintings > metaphor comes to mind.
Dan: Oh no, absolutely not. The metaphysics of substance stands in contradiction to the Metaphysics of Quality. RMP explains this in LILA quite carefully. I can't believe you would say something like this, Ron. Maybe you need to re-read the book? Frankly, I don't even know where to begin... Ron: In Lila he states that a subject object metaphysics is a metaphysics of quality only it has a flaw, the consequences of it have lead to a modern crisis in western civilisation. Lets not start with this re-read Lila rhetorical garbage please, not going to work. nice try though. If you do not know where to begin then lets begin with the quote: "There already is a metaphysics of quality. A subject-object metaphysics is in fact a metaphysics in which the first division of Quality - the first slice of undivided experience - is into subjects and objects. Once you have made that slice, all of human experience is supposed to fit into one of these two boxes. The trouble is, it doesn't. What he had seen is that there is a metaphysical box that sits above these two boxes, Quality itself. And once he'd seen this he also saw a huge number of ways in which Quality can be divided. Subjects and objects are just one of the ways." Lila chp 9 As You were saying Dan? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
