Hi Mark, I certainly would not want to be understood as supporting logical anarchy, chaos or nihilism, but nor do I believe things are necessarily 'this OR that.' Even with the hindsight of history, there might be disagreement concerning meaningfulness.
Marsha On Apr 24, 2011, at 12:25 PM, 118 wrote: > Hi Marsha, > Certainly meaningfulness in the moment can be subjective. There are > cases, however, where certain meaningfulness is supported through > subsequent history. We could then state that it is possible that one > thing is more meaningful than another in that context, and in fact > have its roots in the moment. Otherwise meaningfulness becomes > meaningless. And we don't want that kind of nihilism in this forum. > > Mark > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 12:38 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Apr 24, 2011, at 3:14 AM, X Acto wrote: >> >>> >>> Ron: >>> I'm sorry Dan but you do need to explain yourself if you care about any >>> sort of >>> meaningful philosophic discussion. >> >> Marsha: >> Most philosophic discussions are based on disagreement. And "meaningful" >> is in the eyes of the beholder. Also what is 'acceptable explanation' is >> another >> relative matter. >> >> >> >> ___ ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
