Dmb, I hope MoQ'ers also recognize your extensive use of argumentum ad populum, argumentum ad verecundiam and the much overused, your favorite: argumentum ad hominem. And personally I find your whining criticism goes to the point of argumentum ad nauseam.
Marsha > > Thanks, Jan-Anders. The truth is I lost patience with Marsha a long time ago > and now I fully expect her to miss, evade or confuse every point, every time. > In fact, my responses to Marsha aren't even written for her because that > would only be a futile effort. But I hope other MOQers get something out of > it and I'm glad it looks like patience. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jan-Anders said to Marsha: >> >> I don't think you're funny. Your dispute with dmb is very interesting as I >> can find examples of this in many places and situations. The ability to >> master the tools which can bridge over this valley of misunderstanding is >> very useful and I'd really would like to know what buttons to press to solve >> it. >> >> I can sense a shimmer of seductive scent in Wallaces way of describing what >> he call the reality. It is opening a world of unresponsibility which I don't >> buy. The fact that QUALITY is yet undefined doesn't mean that it has no >> value. >> >> I buy things that I like. I care for values. I like David's patience with >> you. >> >> Please take care >> >> Jan-Anders > > ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
