Marsha said to dmb:
You have pulled my comments out of their context, exaggerated and
misrepresented things I have said through nonsense paraphrasing, and set this
up as a contradiction. You have no idea what a rational argument is other than
it sounds "reasonable" to you. ...You have no idea of what you are talking
about.
dmb says:
I don't need to "set up" a contradiction. Everyone has seen your definition of
static patterns many, many times. And just a little while ago I showed you how
your definition of static patterns is actually based on descriptions of dynamic
reality. I used your words and your textual evidence. There is no need to take
anything out of context or to exaggerate because the contradiction is already
there quite conspicuously and repeatedly. It's all in the archives and so
denying it is both foolish and futile.
Again, to counter the demand for proper use of terms with quotes about
undefined Dynamic Quality is to change the subject from dictionaries to the
mystic reality, from reason to mysticism. To confuse these two things is to
misunderstand the distinction between DQ and static quality. You're hacking up
the MOQ real bad, sister. Not to mention the torture you've inflicted on the
language. I'm guessing you weren't an English major.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
