On Jun 19, 2011, at 10:45 AM, X Acto wrote: > > > > > Marsha said: > I have probably read more commentary about causation than any other > Buddhist explanation of Emptiness. It is the first topic addressed in > Nagarjuna's MMK. Nagarjuna's logic is not easy. It seems he may > have been battling a particular form of logic, called Nyaya. Regardless > of the methodology, causation has dissolved, for me, into interdependency, > entanglement. And this does not diminish one's sense of responsibility > (caring) in the least; quite the opposite. A multi-directional preference? > > > I do not deny choice as a static pattern (conventional truth.) But it > implies a > > chooser and something chosen. - I know, I know, this drives every one > crazy, > but I cannot divorce myself from my experience, just to fall into line. Btw, > I'm > > not talking about the mountaintop form of experience, but a very potent > experience none the less. > > > Ron: > The chooser and the something chosen dilemma, is especially a dilemma when > one considers both are composed of choices. The question then becomes what > is the action of choice? some would say the very act of being is the act of > choice > and if the explanation begins with this, the chooser and that which is chosen > dilemma > is a conventional one.
Hi Ron, I'm not quite sure what you are suggesting, but it seems to me if mindful, experience flows smoothly without a need for choosing. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
