On 7/5/11 5:15 AM, "Steven Peterson" <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip>
> Steve:
> I've said all along that we act on our preferences, we will acts, we
> make choices, we have desires and intentions. What I have pointed out
> is that in the MOQ, as Pirsig says, this free will/determinism thing
> is a non-issue. Deeterminism is denied with a world composed of
> nothing but value, and it is meaningless to add the word "free" in
> claiming "free will." We make choices. Sure, but what does it mean to
> say that your choices are free? They aren't free, they are
> manifestations of your preferences, and we don't freely choose our
> preferences. In the MOQ we ARE our preferences, so the MOQ clearly
> denies both horns of the supposed dilemma.
<snip>
Hi Steve and All;
In a DQ/SQ metaphysical description for reality how do we know indefinable
DQ? For myself I am content to accept levels in evolution. DQ is an
indefinable yet knowable root in every evolutionary step. I prefer to call
that step to a self-awareness that takes part in all my behavior the
emotional level in self-consciousness DQ, experienced and indefinable.
Joe
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
